Review



aba cage  (Campden Instruments)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Campden Instruments aba cage
    (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the <t>ABA</t> <t>cage/model</t> (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).
    Aba Cage, supplied by Campden Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/aba+cage/pmc03905269-63-12-37?v=Campden+Instruments
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    aba cage - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Rethinking Food Anticipatory Activity in the Activity-Based Anorexia Rat Model"

    Article Title: Rethinking Food Anticipatory Activity in the Activity-Based Anorexia Rat Model

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/srep03929

    (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage/model (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).
    Figure Legend Snippet: (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage/model (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay



    Similar Products

    aba cage  (Campden Instruments)
    90
    Campden Instruments aba cage
    (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the <t>ABA</t> <t>cage/model</t> (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).
    Aba Cage, supplied by Campden Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/aba+cage/pmc03905269-63-12-37?v=Campden+Instruments
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    aba cage - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage/model (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Rethinking Food Anticipatory Activity in the Activity-Based Anorexia Rat Model

    doi: 10.1038/srep03929

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a): FAA was lower in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage/model (significant on the last day (p < 0.01)). (b): PPA was higher in the HS group than the rest on the second last and the last day in the ABA cage (second last day: HS significantly higher than MS (p < 0.05) but not NS; last day: HS significantly higher than both MS and NS (p < 0.01). (c): NA was higher in the HS group on the second last day than the NS group and the MS group (p < 0.01), and was not the highest in the HS group on the last day (sample mean difference insignificant). (d): FA was the lowest in the HS group on the last day in the ABA cage (significantly lower than the MS group, p < 0.01). For more detailed graphical representation of the overall data, two data points were not shown (but included in the statistical analysis) in (one in second last day of NS and one in last day of NS, valued 814 and 704, respectively). NS: non-susceptible group, MS: moderately-susceptible group, HS: highly-susceptible group, PPA: postprandial activity, NA: nocturnal activity, FAA: food anticipatory activity, FA: feeding activity; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 (analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests).

    Article Snippet: Starting on Day 0, each rat was introduced in/moved to an individual ABA cage (36 × 36 cm; custom-made) with a running wheel (35 cm in diameter, one rotation corresponds to a distance of approximately 110 cm; Campden Instruments, Loughborough, UK) at 11AM after baseline body weight was measured.

    Techniques: Activity Assay